Jason Baynard, NBIS Underwriting Manager, National Accounts.
As one of the country’s premier insurers of crane and rigging, heavy haul, and concrete pump companies, we are keenly aware of the many variables we have to take into consideration—like the size, weight, and damage potential of these types of machines— in order to help facilitate the safety of our insured’s employees, as well as any surrounding property or people. While we take every possible step to proactively mitigate the potential for incidents, they can and do happen. So when losses do occur, we make certain we gain as much insight into why they happened—and then use this knowledge to try and avoid repeat situations.
At the Inland Marine Underwriters Association (IMUA) Annual Meeting held in Leesburg, Virginia this past May, I presented the following case study which outlined an incident involving a piece of heavy equipment owned by the General Contractor (GC) who brought in our insured. The NBIS policyholder was tasked with lifting and setting a number of power poles in a residential neighborhood in Lauderhill, Florida, using a 160-T crane.
The insured’s crews were working at the site for two weeks prior to the incident, a time period that saw near-constant heavy rains in the area. On the day of the incident, the crane operator and flagger noticed standing water on the ground at the work site and asked the General Contractor to move the crane and the operation to another street.
Unfortunately, the General Contractor denied the request, and work proceeded as planned. While performing the work, the crane began to sink into the street and ultimately tipped over. The crane operator acted quickly to move the crane away from the people on the site and avoid causing any injury. However, total losses incurred totaled close to one million dollars.
So, what lessons can we learn? Here are the major takeaways:
The final lesson is crucial for preventing future incidents and perpetuating an enhanced safety culture throughout our company and at the industry level. Monetary losses are worth learning from and avoiding, but the number one risk factor in this incident, and others like it, is the possibility of injury to crews and uninvolved people near job sites.